Dyson HushJet SP01-A Air Purifier for 203 Sq Ft
Updated October 30, 2026 · Based on published specs and aggregated owner reviews
Dyson HushJet SP01
Shark HP062 BreatheClear Compact Pro
The Dyson HushJet wins this comparison on the provided data. It earned a higher LAT score (86 vs 81), a higher user rating (4.5 vs 4.2), and more reviews (243 vs 219). The Shark costs less and covers more square feet, but the Dyson's higher satisfaction ratings made the difference.
When you're searching for a room purifier, the Dyson HushJet and the Shark BreatheClear Compact Pro are two options with different trade-offs. The Dyson is priced at $299.99, while the Shark is $229.99. The Dyson covers 203 sq ft, and the Shark covers 300 sq ft. The Dyson has more reviews and a higher user rating. This comparison uses the provided data to show where each model stands.
| Spec | Dyson HushJet SP01 | Shark HP062 BreatheClear Compact Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price & where to buy |
-14%
29
Dyson HushJet SP01-A Air Purifier for 203 Sq Ft
In Stock
$299.99
$349.99
Save $50.00
Updated: October 17, 2026
Price as of Oct 17, 2026. We earn from qualifying purchases.
1 / 29
1 / 29
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated. |
15
Shark HP062 BreatheClear Compact Pro Air Purifier
In Stock
$229.99
Updated: October 17, 2026
Price as of Oct 17, 2026. We earn from qualifying purchases.
1 / 15
1 / 15
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated. |
| Room coverage | 203 sq ft | 300 sq ft |
| Filtration | Electrostatic | HEPA |
| Smallest particle captured | 0.3 micron | Not listed |
| Noise (quietest setting) | 42 dB | Not listed |
| Controls | Wi-Fi, App | Not listed |
| Dimensions | 9.06"D x 9.06"W x 18.5"H | 9.18 x 9.34 x 11.54 inches; 5.58 pounds |
| Weight | 6.9 pounds | Not listed |
you place more value on user feedback and an overall higher data score than on the sticker price. The Dyson HushJet has a 4.5 rating from 243 reviews, while the Shark has a 4.2 rating from 219 reviews. The Dyson also scored 86 on the provided LAT scale versus the Shark's 81. You'll pay $299.99, but you get a smart-control purifier with Wi-Fi, app, and voice features, plus a five-year electrostatic filter and an activated carbon filter for odors and gases.
your priority is a lower upfront price and broader room coverage. The Shark BreatheClear Compact Pro costs $229.99 and lists a 300 sq ft coverage area, while the Dyson covers 203 sq ft and costs $299.99. The Shark also weighs less at 5.58 pounds versus Dyson's 6.9 pounds. Its manufacturer says no filter changes are needed for up to six years, and it lists HEPA-exceeding filtration rated to capture 99.98% of particles with an auto-adjusting fan that scans 3,600 times per hour.
The data points to the Dyson HushJet as the winner. Its LAT score of 86 tops the Shark's 81. User feedback also favors the Dyson: a 4.5 rating from 243 reviews, compared with Shark's 4.2 from 219 reviews. The Dyson's listed features include a fully sealed design, an electrostatic filter rated for 99.97% capture at 0.3 microns, an activated carbon layer for odors and gases, and Wi-Fi/app/voice controls. The Shark counters with a lower price, a 300 sq ft coverage rating, a lighter body, a no-filter-change claim for up to six years, and a 99.98% capture rating. But the Shark's own long-term filter claim is based on manufacturer data and has not been independently verified by long-term reviews. The Dyson also has a higher user rating and a higher overall score in the provided data. While the Shark offers more square footage for less money, the Dyson's stronger user satisfaction and higher LAT score are the deciding factors in this data-driven comparison.
Check Dyson HushJet SP01 PriceFull reviews: Dyson SP01-A Review: Silent Power in a Compact Design · Shark HP062 Review: No Filter Changes for 6 Years
The Dyson HushJet has a user rating of 4.5 out of 5 based on 243 reviews. The Shark BreatheClear Compact Pro has a user rating of 4.2 out of 5 based on 219 reviews. The Dyson also has a higher LAT score of 86, while the Shark scores 81.
The Shark BreatheClear Compact Pro lists room coverage of 300 sq ft. The Dyson HushJet lists room coverage of 203 sq ft. If you need to cover a larger single room, the Shark has a bigger listed footprint. The data also lists the Shark as limited to smaller rooms up to that 300 sq ft size.
The Dyson HushJet uses an electrostatic filter rated to capture 99.97% of particles as small as 0.3 microns, plus an activated carbon filter for odors and gases. The Shark BreatheClear Compact Pro lists HEPA-exceeding filtration rated to capture 99.98% of particles. The Shark's manufacturer says no filter changes are needed for up to six years, while the Dyson's electrostatic filter is listed to last up to five years.
The Dyson HushJet lists Wi-Fi, app, and voice controls through the MyDyson app. It can set schedules and provide air quality reports. The Shark BreatheClear Compact Pro's listed features and specs do not include smart controls, so no smart-control claim can be made for it from the data.
The Dyson HushJet is priced at $299.99. The Shark BreatheClear Compact Pro is priced at $229.99. That puts the Dyson $70 higher in price. The Dyson does come with more listed smart features, while the Shark has a larger listed coverage area and a lighter weight.
The Dyson HushJet lists an operational noise of 42 dB at its quietest setting, and the manufacturer notes it may be noticeable at higher speeds. The Shark BreatheClear Compact Pro does not include a noise spec in the provided data, so a direct noise comparison is not possible from these facts.
As an Amazon Associate we may earn from qualifying purchases. No paid placements; scores come from specs and owner ratings.